► Questioner: “What is really going on in Venezuela from the Galactic eye in the sky?!”
► Channelled by Dave Akira
► Message Received Date: Jan 4th
► Video Link:
I, am Ashtar. I come to be with you at this time, in these moments when your world seems to pivot on a single headline, and yet the deeper movement is not a political drama at all. Beneath the speeches and slogans, what is shifting is the movement of resources, the control of corridors, and the quiet reassignment of who is permitted to touch certain levers of your civilization. You are watching Venezuela move into the spotlight because, for many years, it has been treated as an extraction node rather than a nation with a living soul, a culture, and millions of human hearts. In certain circles, a country is reduced to geology, location, and compliance, and when the node is secure the public story is calm, while when the node is threatened the public story becomes loud. Hold this lens gently, and the pieces begin to arrange themselves without needing you to cling to fear. Venezuela is a vault of density in the earthly sense: oil corridors and refining potential, gold and other conductor metals, and, in the borderlands where jungle meets disputed ground, deposits that feed the circuitry of your coming era. Many are trained to look at oil alone, and oil is indeed a lever, but it is not the only lever. Your present economy and your future economy both rest on materials that make batteries, magnets, guidance systems, shielding, sensors, and micro-manufacturing possible. In the places that maps call remote or ungoverned, there are quiet contests over rare earths, lithium-bearing zones, and other strategic deposits, because these are the ingredients that allow a nation, or a corporation, to build the next generation of technology. When you hear phrases like ‘security’ and ‘stability’, remember that those words often sit on top of material supply chains. Because you have asked for the broader, hidden layer, I will speak in a symbolic language that still points toward truth. There are sub-surface facilities on your planet that function like ports without water, where cargo moves through tunnels and controlled airspace rather than open docks, and where records are kept in compartmented ledgers that ordinary investigators never see. In such places, trade is not always measured by legal customs, and the word ‘security’ can cover many kinds of shipment and many kinds of agreement. Some of these agreements are ordinary corruption; some involve intelligence barter; and some touch programs that borrow resources and bodies from the surface world while leaving the surface public in the dark. This is one reason a resource-rich nation can be kept unstable for years: instability becomes a cloak that permits quiet movement while the population is distracted with survival.
This is why I invite you to view Venezuela as a node in a network. Nodes are reinforced, infiltrated, or severed depending on whether they serve the larger system, and the larger system is not merely earthly politics but a hybrid of corporate power, intelligence power, and technologies that operate behind classification walls. For those of you who speak of a secret space program, understand the principle: when a civilization develops capabilities it cannot yet ethically explain to its own population, it tends to hide the supply chains first. Materials that are rare on the surface, or strategically valuable, are diverted into hidden channels, refined through quiet partnerships, and routed to research that never appears in public budgets. In this way, a land that looks like ‘just a country’ can also function as a backstage warehouse for projects that reach far beyond the visible economy. I say to you gently: do not hand your sovereignty to leaders, saviors, or villains. When you stop pouring your creative power into a single figure, you become able to see patterns with less heat and more clarity. Moral language rises in rhythm with extraction schedules; outrage spikes when contracts are renegotiated; humanitarian narratives appear when a corridor must be opened or when a rival must be discredited. This does not mean you distrust every good intention, and it does not require that you harden your heart. It means you become adult in discernment, capable of compassion without naivete, and capable of hope without surrendering your intuition. In this state, propaganda loses its grip, because it feeds on unexamined emotion. So hold compassion in one hand and clear sight in the other. There are ordinary people inside Venezuela who have carried burdens far heavier than the stories told about them, and it is for them that liberation must ultimately serve, not for corporations, not for empires, and not for unseen committees. You may feel the tug of outrage and the pull of ‘choose a side’, yet the deeper dynamic is a contest over nodes, corridors, and the future economy being assembled on Earth and, in some cases, above it. As you continue to move forward on your own time-line, keep this steady understanding close, because it explains why the next events were framed as a dramatic raid and a dramatic capture. What looked like one man’s fall was also a signal across a network, and that is what we must speak about next.
And to those of you who are sensitives, starseeds, and quiet watchers, I acknowledge what you feel when you look at that land. You sense not only the visible hardship but the invisible pressure, as if the very air carries the weight of competing agendas. This sensation is not imaginary. When multiple groups attempt to pull a node into their control, the electromagnetic environment, the media environment, and even the social fabric of a country can feel frayed. Do not interpret this as doom. Interpret it as a sign that a hidden grip is loosening, because grips tighten before they slip. Hold your own field steady, send compassion to the people on the ground, and remember that no extraction node is worth a human soul. When humanity remembers this, the network that feeds on forgetfulness begins to fail. Many of you have heard the phrase “quantum financial system,” and you have felt a mixture of curiosity and caution, because you have watched systems promise relief while slipping new chains into the old pattern; so let us speak in a way that respects your intelligence and your lived experience, for you do not need grand promises, you need clarity, and you are not asking for theatrical certainty, you are asking for something you can recognize as true in your bones. What is called the QFS is not a single invention, nor is it a moment where a curtain lifts and everything becomes easy; it is a correction in the place where exchange is made final—the moment a trade is truly completed, recorded, and no longer “negotiable” behind closed doors—and this matters more than many realize, because when completion is slow and opaque, the delay becomes a hiding place, and the hiding place becomes a business model, and the people pay the cost without ever being shown the ledger that explains why their effort buys less and less. You have been shown, through years of hard lessons, that enormous trades—especially energy trades—have often moved through corridors built for intermediaries, fog, and plausible deniability, where proceeds can slip away into shells and shadows; and the tragedy is not only economic, it is psychological, because it trains the human spirit to believe that value is always stolen by the unseen, and that honesty is naïve, and that survival requires secrecy. When events around Venezuela rose to the surface of global attention, and when you heard of the removal of Maduro, many interpreted it as a political drama, yet the deeper pressure point is the same one you always feel when a major resource node shifts: “How will the world close the loop on what is about to move?” Because it is one thing to speak of reserves and reconstruction, and quite another to build a settlement method that is strong enough to carry immense trade without inviting the old games back in through the side door; a nation can rebuild pipelines and ports, but if the settlement layer remains corruptible, then rebuilding becomes another harvest for those who have mastered disappearance.
This is why speed becomes more than convenience; it becomes safety, because when a large trade takes days to complete, risk accumulates in the gap, inviting interference and double dealing, and so the new direction you are witnessing is a demand for near‑instant finality with a permanent audit trail—an exchange that closes quickly, leaves a clear record, and can be verified without relying on trust in personalities; in this way, transparency is not an ideal, it becomes a design requirement, because the design itself removes the hiding places. And yet, be gentle with yourselves as this unfolds, because transitions of this scale happen in layers; there will be a period where the legacy rails keep operating because too many depend upon them, while a newer clearing layer is used selectively in the highest‑stakes corridors, quietly, carefully, the way one tests a bridge before opening it to an entire city, and during such times the public story lags, which is why rumor grows and why so many feel pulled toward fear or frenzy. You may also notice that as transparency increases at the point where transactions are finalized, many old arrangements become uncomfortable, because what was once hidden must now be reconciled; this can look like volatility, sudden headlines, institutions blaming one another, yet it is simply the light reaching the bookkeeping of a civilization, and bookkeeping is where many deeper injustices were stored. If you feel weary when these waves rise, slow down, drink water, step outside, and remember that upheaval is not always danger; sometimes it is truth changing hands. So I ask you to hold discernment as a sacred practice: do not let anyone turn your awakening into a wager, do not hand your peace to those who demand urgency, and do not mistake financial chatter for spiritual guidance; you are not here to chase numbers like moths chasing flame, you are here to become coherent human beings, and coherence includes practical wisdom—protecting what you have, refusing shortcuts that require you to abandon your ethics, and remembering that a true reset is a return to right relationship, not a rush into another spell. In the higher view, the QFS matters because it invites energetic honesty back into exchange; money, in its cleanest form, is simply agreement—time for time, work for work, resource for resource—so when agreement is twisted into a debt labyrinth that few can understand, it becomes a tool of psychological pressure, teaching scarcity even in abundance, training fear in place of trust, and pressing people into survival mode where they cannot create, cannot rest, and cannot remember who they are. There is also a wider horizon, and I speak of it softly: as your civilization moves toward more advanced technologies and broader horizons beyond your planet, the old model of hidden extraction and untracked value cannot survive, for beyond your current structures the margin for distortion narrows and consequences arrive quickly; precision becomes stewardship, stewardship becomes survival, and survival demands that what is taken, what is traded, and what is owed can be seen. Let this knowledge steady you; notice the small signs of change when transparency is demanded at the very place where value is finalized, and notice the inner change when you choose integrity in the small exchanges of your own life; this is how the new world arrives—through countless honest transactions, countless moments of discernment, countless quiet refusals to participate in what degrades the human spirit.
Now we speak of what I will call the signal operation. When a hidden network wants to change the ownership of a node, it does not only move contracts and money; it broadcasts a message to every other node that is listening. In your public world, the story looks like an arrest, a raid, or a sudden collapse of a leader, yet in the inner world it functions like a coded announcement: ‘the corridor has changed hands, the shield has been lifted, the old permissions are revoked’. This is why the spectacle around the taking of Maduro was so carefully shaped, because it was not merely about removing a man; it was about rewriting what every allied group, every rival group, and every hidden operator believes is possible in this time-line. You were given hints, even in the rumors, that the operation was prepared well in advance: staging across multiple locations, aircraft and assets that can arrive and depart without being trapped, rehearsals that mirror the target environment, and a willingness to wait for the right window. This is the detail that matters, dear ones: windows. Weather, visibility, and timing are not small factors when an operation must be exact, because the more complex the extraction, the more it depends on precision rather than force. When you hear that delays were caused by storms, cloud cover, or regional disruption, you are hearing a truth that is often hidden in plain sight: even the most powerful groups still work within the physics of your atmosphere, and they still require clear corridors, both in the sky and in the information field. There is another truth that matters: the role of insiders. Large structures do not fall only from external pressure; they fall when the interior ring begins to communicate with the outside. An inner circle asset, a quiet informant, a compromised loyalist, a person who decides their survival is worth more than their oath, these are the hinge points in modern operations. This is why you will hear about intelligence assets, about people close to the center who were passing details. In the hidden world, loyalty is rarely moral; it is transactional. Today an asset cooperates, tomorrow the same asset may be bought by another offer. This is why you will see rapid shifts, denials, sudden speeches of outrage, and sudden promises of cooperation, because the network is trying to determine which way the wind is truly blowing. Notice also how the imagery is designed. When a captured leader is shown isolated from sound, isolated from sight, and carried in a manner that removes all agency, the image is not for him. It is for everyone watching who imagines they are untouchable. It is theater aimed at the ego of the inner ring, a reminder that safe rooms, loyal guards, and public bravado do not always protect you when a larger machine decides to move. This is the same psychology used in many covert programs: create an image that enters the collective subconscious and then allow fear, admiration, and confusion to do the rest. A mature heart does not worship the image and does not panic from the image. A mature heart observes the message: the corridor has been breached, and the old certainty has dissolved.
For those of you tracking the secret space program thread, understand that such operations also function as demonstrations of aerospace control. They imply that surveillance eyes were already in place, that communication lines were mapped, and that airspace could be dominated long enough for an insertion and extraction. Whether one chooses to call this advanced satellite coordination, drone coordination, or something even more classified, the principle is the same. When a group shows it can enter and exit with precision, it is telling every contractor, every rival service, and every black-budget compartment: ‘we can reach you’. And when such a message is sent on Earth, it echoes upward as well, because hidden off-world corridors are often anchored to earthly logistics. A node shift on the surface can mean a supply shift in programs you do not see, and that is why this moment feels larger than a single nation. Do not let this overwhelm you. I know that some of you feel the sensation of a chessboard moving at high speed, and you wonder where the human being fits within it. The human being fits in the one place the network cannot fully control: your consciousness. You are not asked to worship covert power, and you are not asked to deny that covert power exists. You are asked to become coherent enough that propaganda cannot hook you, and stable enough that fear cannot use you as a battery. When you hold steady, you become harder to steer, and that is why the greatest battles are fought in the nervous systems of ordinary people. One more subtlety, dear friends: every major move becomes a precedent in the story-world of nations. When one power acts beyond borders, another power studies the method and asks how it can apply it to its own objectives, and so an action in one hemisphere can become a talking point in another. This is why you may hear analysts say, in coded language, that the event will be used as a template elsewhere. It is not only a geopolitical concern; it is also a consciousness concern, because precedents are how collectives learn what is ‘allowed’. Your task is to remember that no precedent is permanent when humanity is awake. You can refuse to accept a world where force and secrecy are the final authorities, and you can choose instead to become the authority of your own field. In that choice, a different time-line strengthens. And so, as this signal reverberates, you will see the next layer: succession, fracture, and the domino effects that spread through allied systems. When a node is shaken, those who fed from it must scramble, and those who depended on it must choose a new arrangement. Let us move into this now.
When a public figure is removed, the surface mind assumes there is an orderly handoff. Yet in many nations, especially those that have been held in place by external pressure and internal patronage, succession becomes a contest of factions. You have already felt this in the way voices compete: one voice claims willingness to negotiate, another voice denounces, a third voice calls the action illegitimate, and the military posture shifts as different commanders decide where their safety lies. This is not simply a constitutional question. It is a question of who controls the security apparatus, who controls the money spigots, and who controls the narratives that keep the population either calm or inflamed. The moment Maduro was removed from his seat, a vacuum opened, and vacuums are never empty for long. In your research, you have seen the suggestion that the visible leader was never truly alone, and that certain external advisers and intelligence structures were deeply embedded in the machinery of the state. Consider this as a pattern rather than a single accusation: when a regime survives despite widespread hardship, it is often because another apparatus is holding the line. In Venezuela’s case, you have heard of an island neighbor with a long history of security exports, of advisers who occupy key posts, and of internal policing systems designed to monitor loyalty. You have also heard that the successor figure is not a fresh reformer but someone rooted in the old structure, and so the struggle is not ‘new versus old’ but ‘old factions versus old factions’, each trying to decide whether to align with the new external pressure or resist it to preserve their own survival. In such moments, international alliances show their true shape. Nations that have invested money, technology, or influence into a node do not want to lose their access, and so they speak loudly of sovereignty, illegality, and outrage, even when they have ignored sovereignty elsewhere. You will see statements, condemnations, and warnings, and you will watch how each power uses the event to advance its own narrative. One power will say this proves intervention is acceptable. Another will say this proves intervention is criminal. A third will quietly study the operation and ask how to replicate it. Do not be distracted by the moral theater. Watch the resource theater. Watch who has loans, ports, contracts, and processing capacity, and you will understand why they respond the way they do. Dominoes do not fall only in one region. A signal in one place can accelerate instability in another, particularly where populations have been pressured for decades. You have already heard, in your information stream, that an ancient land in the Middle East is shaking, that the public is refusing to be suppressed, and that even security forces are uncertain whether to continue defending a collapsing center. Whether every report is perfectly accurate is less important than the trend: collective tolerance for abuse is dropping in multiple regions at once. When a major power speaks a threat out loud, and then demonstrates follow-through in one theater, other theaters hear it as well, and the nervous systems of both governments and populations respond. This is one reason your year feels like a rapid sequence rather than a slow unfolding.
There is also the matter of exits. When a node is seized, those who operated quietly within it attempt to leave, and the borders become less about stopping ordinary migration and more about intercepting specialists, couriers, and foreign operatives who know too much. You will notice, in your sources, that attention turns to border regions and to who is moving, because movement itself becomes evidence of hidden affiliation. In this way, a political event becomes an intelligence sorting event: who flees, who stays, who suddenly becomes loud, and who suddenly disappears. If you watch carefully, you will see that the scramble is not only for headlines but for files, servers, ledgers, and hardware, because in the modern age the true treasure is not only gold under the ground but also information that proves who financed what, who owned what, and who directed what. And when information begins to surface, it reshapes the time-line far more than any single speech. Some ask: why does any nation look outward when it has problems at home? The hidden answer is that many ‘domestic’ crises are fed by external pipelines. When a society is flooded with destabilizing substances, when corruption is financed through offshore channels, when elections are influenced by technologies or money routed through foreign nodes, then the source matters as much as the symptom. In your research, Venezuela appears as a source node for more than one kind of pipeline: material pipelines, money pipelines, and influence pipelines. This is why the story is framed as ‘cleaning up’ and ‘restoring order’, because the system is attempting to justify a reconfiguration of the supply chains that have harmed ordinary people in multiple countries. For those of you tracking the secret space program lens, there is an additional layer: covert infrastructures are interlinked. When one node destabilizes, it can expose routes, reveal alliances, and force other compartments to reroute. This is why rumors of wider crackdowns appear, and why some perceive a larger takedown sequence. In a hidden network, the safest moment to act is when multiple dominoes can be triggered at once, because each falling piece distracts from the next, and each shock overwhelms the ability of opponents to coordinate. Whether one calls this a military strategy, an intelligence strategy, or a time-line strategy, it is the same logic: move faster than the adversary can adapt. And now I offer a word of balance. Do not celebrate suffering, and do not romanticize collapse. When systems crack, ordinary people can be frightened, supply chains can be disrupted, and opportunists can exploit the chaos. Hold the vibration of stability, and hold the prayer that any shift in power serves the people rather than a new set of masters. As this vacuum forms and alliances scramble, you will naturally wonder: who is truly pulling the levers behind the scenes? That question brings us into the next layer, the shadow governance and the inner ring.
You ask, rightly, who truly governs when governments appear to be puppets. I will answer in a way that preserves your discernment. Shadow governance is not one person, and it is not one room. It is a layered arrangement: banking nodes that can create and withhold money, intelligence nodes that can collect and weaponize secrets, corporate nodes that can move resources and technology across borders, and ideological or initiatic nodes that shape belief systems over generations. These layers overlap, and the overlap is where power hides, because each layer can claim innocence while the combined machine produces outcomes that no single layer will publicly admit to authoring. In your research, you encountered echoes of older covert financing systems, the kinds that flourish in times of war and crisis because fear makes oversight weak and urgency makes people compliant. When records are destroyed, when accounts are moved through private banks, and when operations are funded outside public budgets, a parallel state can grow. In such a parallel state, drugs, weapons, and contracts become currencies, and politicians become temporary managers rather than true decision-makers. This is why some whistleblowers speak of ‘one big crime’ rather than isolated scandals. They are pointing to a structure that learned, decades ago, how to fund itself invisibly and how to reward loyalty while punishing honesty. One of the most persistent anchors of this structure is a financial city-state that sits inside a larger nation, protected by tradition, law, and the camouflage of respectability. It is a place where major banks are domiciled, where insurance, derivatives, and reserve mechanisms can enslave populations without a single soldier on the street, and where the language of ‘markets’ becomes a polite mask for control. When your sources speak about ‘honest money’ and the need to remove the grip of fiat and reserve policies, they are pointing to the same anchor. Money, in this system, is not a neutral tool. It is a steering mechanism, and it steers nations into debt, steers populations into austerity, and steers governments into compliance with those who can turn credit on and off. In Central and South America, another layer has always been present: religious influence intertwined with empire, missions intertwined with colonization, and spiritual language used to sanctify extraction. This is not a condemnation of faith, for faith is a beautiful human capacity. It is a reminder that institutions can be captured, and that institutions can bargain. When you hear statements that call for sovereignty while quietly seeking a return of old privileges, you are seeing institutional self-interest, not pure morality. In such regions, spiritual symbolism, political power, and resource control have danced together for centuries, and that dance is still visible when you know how to look.
Another layer you have touched upon is the initiatic network: lodges, fraternities, and private circles that carry symbols across borders more easily than passports. In some regions, these circles are social and charitable, and many sincere people meet there. In other regions, particularly where corruption has been normalized for generations, such circles can become political engines, protecting criminals, laundering reputations, and linking business, intelligence, and law enforcement into a closed loop. This is why some of your sources distinguish between a friendly local lodge and a high-level lodge that behaves like an intelligence cutout. The symbol is not the whole story; the behavior is the story. When secrecy is used to protect virtue, it is one thing. When secrecy is used to protect exploitation, it becomes a weapon. You also encountered, through your sources, the theme of deep infiltration by an eastern superpower through debt, ports, industrial purchases, and fraternal networks. Understand this as a modern strategy: rather than funding guerrillas, buy the infrastructure and own the choke points. Purchase debt and you gain influence over ministries. Establish cultural and business hubs and you gain a quiet intelligence lattice. In some places, community organizations and fraternal societies become conduits for influence, and local politics can be shaped through donations, favors, and kompromat. This is why certain regions, particularly on the western coast of a northern nation, are described by your sources as heavily penetrated. It is not merely about spies. It is about long-term network building. Now I will connect this to the secret space program thread in a grounded way. When hidden programs exist, they require three things: funding, materials, and silence. Shadow governance provides all three. Black money funds research without oversight. Resource nodes provide the metals, isotopes, and components. And compartmentalization provides silence, keeping the surface public arguing about personalities while the deeper machine continues. This is why Venezuela, banking city-states, intelligence factions, and rare earth corridors belong in the same conversation. They are not separate stories. They are different faces of the same architecture: an architecture built to keep advanced capability in the hands of a few, while the many are told they are powerless. And so I counsel you: do not swing into paranoia, and do not swing into denial. Paranoia makes you see enemies everywhere and becomes its own prison. Denial makes you refuse to see patterns and keeps you easy to steer. The balanced posture is simple: observe results, follow incentives, and notice who benefits. When you do this, shadow governance loses the mystique of omnipotence, because you can see it as a set of choices made by humans, and choices can be changed. This is the doorway to true action: not rage, not worship, but informed steadiness. With this steadiness, you can look at the next layer of the puzzle without being thrown off balance: the technological and informational spine that can influence elections, narratives, and even perception itself. We do not share this to make you angry. Anger is useful only when it becomes clean action, and clean action requires clarity. I share this so that you can stop being shocked. When you are no longer shocked, you become steady, and when you become steady you become effective. The next question, then, is how this architecture steers populations without tanks on every corner. One major tool is information systems, especially the systems that decide who is ‘chosen’ to govern, and the systems that can amplify or erase a voice with a button. This brings us to the informational backbone of modern control and the ways it can be exported through certain nodes. Let us speak now of the election spine and the invisible wiring beneath democracy.
When people speak of democracy, they often imagine ballots and speeches, but the true foundation is consent. If a population believes its choice matters, it cooperates. If it believes its choice is meaningless, it fractures. This is why the control architecture invests so heavily in what I call the election spine: the blend of software, hardware, procedures, courts, and media that determines what is accepted as legitimate. In the modern age, legitimacy can be shaped through code as much as through law, and the vendors and intermediaries of election technology become a quiet form of empire. A tool that promises efficiency can also become a tool that concentrates power, especially when it is proprietary, opaque, and protected by legal complexity. In your personal research, Venezuela appears not only as a resource node but also as a narrative node, a place associated with the export of certain voting technologies and influence methods. Whether every detail is exactly as claimed is less important than the structure: systems can be designed so that auditing is difficult, ownership is opaque, and accountability is fractured across jurisdictions. When a system is distributed this way, each party can claim the flaw belongs elsewhere. The manufacturer points to the contractor. The contractor points to the operator. The operator points to the regulator. And the regulator points to the courts. In this maze, truth becomes slow, and slow truth is often treated as no truth at all. This is how confidence is weakened: not always by changing a number, but by making the process too complex for ordinary citizens to understand and verify. Notice also the obsession with servers, offshore facilities, and faraway data centers. In a paper-based world, evidence sits in a box. In a digital world, evidence can be routed, mirrored, scrubbed, or hidden behind layers of legal and technical abstraction. Your sources speak of servers in unexpected places, of data routed through regions far from the ballot box, and of foreign interests being able to touch a process that should belong only to local communities. Again, treat this as a pattern: any system that can be remotely accessed can also be remotely influenced, and any system that lacks transparent auditing invites suspicion. Even if the system is honest, the perception of opacity becomes its own weapon, because the population begins to doubt itself and one another. One additional nuance: digital systems do not live in isolation. The same contractors who build election software often build other forms of civic infrastructure, and the same data centers that host mundane services can host classified services when the right agreements exist. This is why your sources sometimes blur together elections, banking, and security agencies. In a compartmented world, infrastructure is shared, and what is shared can be exploited. A server farm is not only a server farm; it is a jurisdiction, a set of keys, a set of permissions, and a set of people who can be pressured. So when you hear of audits being blocked, of investigators being stonewalled, or of evidence moving across borders, do not only think of political theater. Think of logistical defense. Think of a system protecting its spine. And remember: a spine can be straightened. It requires courage, patient process, and citizens who refuse to give up their attention.
This is why the information war around elections becomes so intense. It is not only about who wins a seat. It is about whether the population will continue to consent to the architecture. When accusations arise, they are met with ridicule, then suppression, then selective disclosure, and then a slow drip of partial confirmations that keep everyone arguing. Some messages are true, some are false, and many are deliberately mixed, because the goal is not simply to hide a fact but to exhaust the public. Exhausted people stop investigating and start identifying with teams. Teams are easy to steer. And so you see polarization manufactured like a product: one side is taught that questioning is disloyal, and the other side is taught that questioning is hopeless. Both trainings serve the same machine. For those of you tracking the secret space program lens, I will connect this gently. The same methods used to steer perception on Earth can be scaled when surveillance and communication systems become planetary in reach. When you hear whispers of satellite-linked monitoring, advanced analytics, and artificial intelligence that can predict and nudge group behavior, you are hearing the natural evolution of influence. Influence becomes more precise when it is data-driven. In some hidden compartments, this is described as probability management: steering outcomes not by a single overt act, but by nudging millions of small inputs until the most desired time-line becomes statistically likely. This is why your intuition matters so much. Intuition is the one instrument that cannot be fully hacked by an external signal. When you listen inwardly, you break the chain of automated steering. And what is your response, dear friends? Not despair, and not violence. Your response is transparency and local sovereignty. Systems that can be audited by ordinary humans, systems with redundancy, paper trails, and clear chain-of-custody, these are not backward; they are wise. They deny the hidden architecture its favorite hiding place, which is complexity. In your own life, practice the same principle. Choose information sources you can verify. Choose communities where accountability is real. Choose conversations where you can disagree without becoming enemies. When you stop feeding the machine with your nervous system, you weaken its power, because so much of modern control is emotional farming disguised as politics. As the election spine is challenged, it intersects with the larger geopolitical scramble, because legitimacy at home determines how boldly a nation acts abroad. This is why accusations of foreign interference become such a hot weapon in this era: they can justify intervention, sanctions, or the restructuring of networks that extend across borders. In the story you are exploring, Venezuela is described as one of the places where influence tools were tested, exported, or routed, and therefore it becomes a target not only for its minerals but also for its informational infrastructure. Now, with that understood, we can step back and see the wider chessboard: three major power centers maneuvering for resources, territory, and technological supremacy, and the off-world ambitions that shadow their decisions.
Now we widen the lens. Your sources describe the end of an older world arrangement, the one that emerged after a great global war, where one nation styled itself as the sheriff and many others accepted, resented, or depended on that role. In the time-line you are observing, that arrangement is cracking, and a new arrangement is forming, not as a clean treaty but as a competition among three major power centers. This is why so many events feel synchronized: resource moves, military postures, and diplomatic statements that appear unrelated are, in fact, responses to the same underlying race. It is a race to secure the materials and the technological supply chains that define the next phase of civilization. One power center seeks to consolidate the western hemisphere, not only for ideology but for logistics: ports, canals, fuel corridors, mineral rights, and reliable access to strategic resources. Another power center, vast and ancient, has built itself into the processing hub of the world, absorbing raw materials from every continent and turning them into the components that power modern life. A third power center, hardened by history, seeks to secure buffer territories and resource-rich regions it considers essential to its survival and status. Each of these centers speaks in moral language when convenient, yet the constant beneath the language is the same: resources, leverage, and strategic depth. This is why Venezuela is not an isolated story. It is one chapter in a larger scramble. In this scramble, nuclear deterrence remains a stern teacher. Some speak as if any leader can be removed the way Maduro was removed, but this is fantasy, because the possession of large nuclear arsenals changes the geometry of power. There are limits to what can be done overtly, and so much is done indirectly: through sanctions, proxy conflicts, cyber operations, energy politics, and the control of critical components. An older strategist once built an entire era around the balance of fear, and even though personalities change, the physics of deterrence remain. This is why you see theater and escalation at once, negotiation and hostility at once, because the players are constrained by weapons they cannot un-invent. This is also why you hear talk of the far north, of Arctic territories, and of islands framed as ‘defense necessities’. The language will be about security and shipping lanes, about rival submarines and rival ships, and there is truth in that. Yet beneath that language is also geology: deposits that become accessible as ice changes, strategic positioning for future shipping, and access to resources that can feed industrial and military systems. When a leader says ‘we need this for defense’, listen also for the unspoken phrase: ‘we need this for supply’. Defense and supply become twins in the era of resource competition.
Then there is the island of microprocessors, the manufacturing crown that supplies the brains of modern machines. It is spoken of as a beacon of freedom or a hostage of history, yet in the inner logic of the scramble it is primarily a technological choke point. Whoever dominates that supply chain gains leverage over everything: communications, artificial intelligence, weapons systems, industry, and finance. Your sources suggest that deep infiltration has already occurred, that influence networks are positioned inside institutions, and that a takeover could happen faster than the public imagines. Whether this unfolds as overt invasion or as quiet political absorption, the principle stands: control of microprocessor capacity is control of the future economy. And so, when you hear of billions spent ‘to defend’, understand also that such spending feeds industries and agendas far beyond the stated purpose. Where does this leave Europe? Many of your sources conclude that Europe becomes the squeezed middle, pressured by energy scarcity, demographic challenges, and an economy increasingly oriented toward war rather than productive renewal. Some will resist this conclusion, yet the trend is visible: factories depend on energy, and when energy arrangements collapse, industrial strength declines. As industrial strength declines, assets become cheap, and those with cash and long patience arrive to buy. This is how empires fade: not only through battles, but through debt, demography, and the slow transfer of ownership. A continent that once exported power may, in this era, import control. Now I will touch the secret space program element that your sources mention directly: the expansion beyond Earth. When nations speak of building reactors on the moon, when they speak of mining and establishing permanent infrastructure, they are revealing that the resource race does not end at the surface of Earth. If a power center believes it can secure off-world resources, it becomes less dependent on earthly trade, and it gains a psychological advantage as well. Some of your sources connect this to silver and other metals, suggesting that Earth is being stripped while eyes turn upward. Whether one takes this literally or symbolically, the theme is clear: the next phase of competition extends into space-based assets, orbital platforms, and the corridors that connect Earth operations to off-world ambitions. This is why the supply chains of rare earths and strategic metals matter so intensely: they are the bridge between present industry and future capability. Do you see now why the three-player scramble and Venezuela are inseparable in this story? The scramble is about the ingredients of power, and power in your era is built from materials, code, and energy. In the sections ahead we will speak of money and metals, because money is the language that resources speak. For now, hold the broader perspective without losing your humanity. A scramble can look like destiny, yet destiny is shaped by consciousness. When enough people refuse to consent to exploitation, the scramble must change form. And that refusal begins with understanding.
We have touched on the QFS and so now we speak further of money and metals, because money is the language that resources speak, and the language is changing. For a long time, fiat systems have trained humanity to accept numbers on a screen as wealth, while the real world of minerals, food, energy, and labor is quietly harvested. Debt becomes the chain, and inflation becomes the invisible tax. When your sources speak of banks being exposed, of old institutions losing credibility, and of the public refusing to fund corruption, they are sensing a collective adjustment: people are remembering that an economy is not a spreadsheet; it is a living exchange among human beings. In such awakenings, precious metals often play both a symbolic and practical role. Silver and gold are not merely ‘investments’; they are mirrors. They reflect confidence or the loss of confidence, and they reveal when paper promises no longer match physical reality. You have heard claims of prices diverging by region, of physical silver trading at far higher levels than paper quotes, and of premiums rising in markets that feel the shortage first. Whether every number cited is exact is less important than the pattern being described: when people no longer trust the paper, they reach for the tangible, and the tangible begins to speak louder than the screen. The mechanics of manipulation are familiar in principle: sell what you do not have, lean on the public’s faith in the quote, and use the complexity of derivatives to obscure imbalances. For years, large institutions have been able to press prices down through paper games, protecting their own positions and preserving the illusion of stability. Yet no paper structure can override physical demand forever. When industrial need rises, when new technology requires more metal, and when ordinary people seek a store of value outside the banking lattice, the pressure builds. In time, the structure either reforms or breaks. Silver, in particular, is not only a coin-metal in human memory; it is an industrial necessity and need for much advanced technology production. It moves electricity efficiently, it supports the manufacturing of electronics, and it appears in technologies that scale when societies modernize. When you hear that the physical metal is disappearing from certain markets, you are hearing the echo of industrial drawdown: more demand meets limited supply, and the gap must be expressed somewhere, either in price or in shortage. This is why some observers focus on the difference between paper markets and physical markets. Paper can be multiplied, but atoms cannot. In the end, atoms are the truth. In a time of awakening, the most important shift is not that a number rises, but that minds reorient toward reality. When enough people remember that value is grounded in real things and real relationships, the spell of the screen begins to weaken. This does not require collapse. It can bring correction. But correction is uncomfortable for those who have benefited from distortion, and this is why you hear your sources speak of institutions being ‘spanked’ or exposed. It is colorful language for a sober truth: systems that manipulate eventually meet the boundary of the real.
Connect this back to Venezuela. In the framework you are building, Venezuela is not only about oil. It is also about gold and silver deposits, about mines that have been underdeveloped or controlled, and about the right to extract and refine. When a resource node is seized, it is not only for present profit but for future leverage, because whoever controls strategic metal supply can influence manufacturing, defense, and currency confidence. This is why a mineral-rich land becomes a bargaining chip in a much larger negotiation about the future of power. You have also heard a theme of fiscal rebellion: people questioning taxes, leaders suggesting alternative revenue models through trade controls and tariffs, and the sense that old agencies may be weakened as new models emerge. In any time of transition, the public asks, ‘why am I paying into a system that does not protect me?’ This question is powerful. It can bring reform, or it can bring chaos, depending on how it is answered. The goal is not simply to starve a system. The goal is to build a fair exchange where citizens can see what they contribute and what they receive, and where corruption cannot hide behind complexity. For those of you carrying the secret space program lens, metals are not abstract. Many advanced technologies depend on specific material properties: conductivity, crystalline structure, resistance to heat, magnetic behavior, and the ability to interact with electromagnetic environments. When you hear whispered stories of exotic alloys, of components that require precise ratios of rare earths, and of shielding that behaves in unusual ways, you are hearing the natural extension of material science into classified territory. Hidden programs, like visible ones, still obey physics, and physics demands the right materials. This is why the race for metals is simultaneously a financial story, an industrial story, and a secret-program story. We will not tell you what to buy, because wisdom is not a prescription and each of you has different circumstances. I will tell you what to become: calm, discerning, and less dependent on fragile systems. Learn the difference between a screen price and a real object. Learn the difference between a promise and a delivery. Build local resilience where you can, and hold your resources with the consciousness of stewardship rather than panic. When you act from panic, you feed the instability you fear. When you act from coherence, you help stabilize the time-line around you. And as money and metals shift, the next great frontier is the one your sources call the economy of the future: robotics, artificial intelligence, and the systems that aim to automate control. These systems depend on the same supply chains, and so the story continues. Let us move there now.
Now we step into what your sources call the economy of the future. It is built on robotics, artificial intelligence, and automated systems that can reshape labor, warfare, and daily human choice. The same leaders and institutions who speak about ‘progress’ understand that whoever controls AI infrastructure controls the next chapter of power, because AI is not merely a tool; it is an amplifier. It amplifies surveillance. It amplifies persuasion. It amplifies production. It can amplify harm when welded to greed and fear, or amplify healing when guided by conscience. This is why the race for rare earths, microprocessors, and data centers is not a side story. It is the core story of the coming decade. AI and robotics require physical ingredients. They require the magnets that move motors efficiently. They require the elements that make high-performance chips stable. They require batteries that can store energy densely. Your research emphasizes rare earth elements and allied materials as the quiet obsession behind many geopolitical moves, and this is accurate as a pattern. A nation can have brilliant programmers, but without the supply chain of materials, it cannot manufacture at scale. This is why resource nodes like Venezuela, and borderlands rich in strategic deposits, become priorities. It is also why conflicts over other territories are reframed as moral crusades while, beneath the moral language, the same question is being asked: who will own the ingredients of the machine age? There is also a more grounded reason the rare earth story matters here. Robotics and AI are built not only in laboratories but in factories, and factories require steady supply. When supply is threatened, nations behave more aggressively, and when aggression is justified, the public is fed a story that keeps attention on personalities rather than materials. So the same corridor that carries minerals can also carry narratives, and the same conflict that is framed as ideology can also be a procurement strategy. This is one reason you are right to trace Venezuela, rare earth corridors, and AI expansion in a single arc. They are not separate in the minds of planners. You have heard, in your sources, the prediction of robotic soldiers and automated policing, and this is not far-fetched in principle. Already on your surface, prototypes demonstrate athletic movement, coordination, and the ability to operate without fatigue. Imagine such systems integrated with surveillance networks, face recognition, predictive analytics, and autonomous weapons. The result is not only a change in warfare but a change in protest, because a population can be managed without human hesitation. This is why some of your sources use stark language like ‘robocops’ and ‘robo soldiers’. They are pointing to a threshold where control becomes mechanized, and mechanized control is harder to soften with empathy.
When you hear that an eastern superpower is held up as a model by certain global planners, understand what is meant: total integration of citizen life with digital identity, transaction tracking, and behavioral incentives. This can be packaged as convenience, safety, or modernization, but the underlying architecture is obedience by design. Your sources connect this to the capture of institutions, to censorship, and to the shaping of public perception through algorithms. Whether you call it social credit or something else, the pattern is the same: reward compliance, punish dissent, and make dissent economically painful. When such systems are combined with AI that can generate convincing narratives, images, and voices, the line between truth and fabrication can be blurred in seconds. You will notice, as this accelerates, that the battlefield becomes the screen. AI can generate convincing text, images, and voices, and this means the next wave of propaganda will not only be loud; it will be personalized. Two people can be shown two different realities and then encouraged to hate each other for it. This is why I encourage you to cultivate media discernment as a spiritual practice. Before you share, pause. Before you react, breathe. Before you become certain, ask what emotion is being harvested. The most sophisticated deception is the one that feels like righteous urgency. When you slow down, you break the automation. When you refuse to let your nervous system be farmed, you reclaim your humanity. And yes, dear ones, humor helps. Humor punctures hypnosis. Kindness dissolves polarization. Both are forms of resistance that a mechanized system cannot easily compute. Some of your sources have named this trajectory ‘cyber satan’. I will not argue about labels, but I will speak about the essence. The essence is the attempt to replace human sovereignty with machine-mediated permission. It is the attempt to make every choice pass through a digital gatekeeper: your money, your speech, your movement, even your relationships. In its extreme form, it is transhumanism without consent, an agenda that treats the human body and mind as obsolete hardware to be upgraded or managed. This is why you feel, as sensitives, that the spiritual battle is not only about politics; it is about the definition of what it means to be human. Now connect this to the secret space program element. In hidden environments, automation has always been attractive, because robots do not leak secrets, do not unionize, do not require morale, and can operate where humans struggle. Lunar or orbital construction, mining, and maintenance become far easier when robotic systems are mature. This is why the push for AI is not only for consumer products. It is also for space-based infrastructure, for autonomous logistics, for surveillance platforms, and for the quiet machinery that keeps classified programs running without public attention. So when you hear talk of reactors beyond Earth or permanent infrastructure beyond Earth, understand that robotics and AI are the hands and the nervous system of that ambition. What is your antidote? It is not anti-technology. It is pro-human. It is the refusal to outsource your conscience. You can use tools without surrendering your soul, but you must practice. Practice telling the truth even when it is inconvenient. Practice building relationships that are not mediated by platforms. Practice learning skills that keep you grounded: food, repair, communication, and community care. And spiritually, practice coherence. A coherent heart is less hackable. A coherent mind is less hypnotized by propaganda. When you hold coherence, you become the kind of citizen a mechanized control system fears, because you are difficult to program. As this machine age accelerates, the control architecture will attempt to manage disclosure: disclosure of corruption, disclosure of hidden programs, and disclosure of contact. This brings us to the next layer: psy-ops, half-truths, and the thresholds at which genuine awakening becomes possible.
Now we arrive at a layer that many of you feel strongly: disclosure. In a world where secrets are currency, disclosure is never random. It is timed, managed, resisted, and sometimes simulated. When a system fears being exposed, it often releases partial truths to control the narrative, or it releases sensational distractions to keep the public from focusing on the real mechanism. This is why, in your sources, you see a blend of real leaks, rumor, prophecy, and deliberate exaggeration. The goal is not only to hide facts; it is to shape the emotional response to facts, because an emotional population can be steered while a calm population asks better questions. You have also noticed a painful pattern: infighting among outspoken voices. One commentator attacks another, alliances fracture, and the audience is pulled into personal drama. This is not always organic. Personalities can be leveraged, and egos can be poked, to turn a truth movement into a soap opera. The public then spends energy choosing sides instead of following evidence. In some cases, your sources claim that certain figures who once appeared independent were in fact tied to hidden fraternal networks or foreign intelligence influence. Again, treat this as a pattern: gatekeepers exist in every field, including alternative media, and the most effective gatekeeper is the one who occasionally tells the truth so that you will trust them when they steer you away from the most damaging truths. As operations unfold, information becomes both weapon and shield. Files are seized, devices are recovered, and quiet communications are intercepted. This is why you see sudden narratives about ‘national security’, sudden protective orders, sudden claims of disinformation, and sudden releases that seem designed to preempt other releases. When you recognize this, you can stop being emotionally whiplashed by each new claim. You can ask the sober question: who benefits from this release, and what larger release is being delayed or covered? In a time of takedowns and restructuring, data is the real treasure, because data proves relationships: who financed whom, who traveled where, who owned what, and who signed which agreement. Data is the thread that unravels the tapestry. Here is a simple discernment practice I offer you. When you encounter a claim, ask three questions. First: does this claim push me into urgency and rage, or does it invite me into clarity and action? Second: does it collapse reality into one villain and one savior, or does it acknowledge complexity without paralysis? Third: does it leave me more connected to humanity, or more isolated and superior? Claims that consistently produce urgency, simplification, and isolation are often steering mechanisms, even if they contain a kernel of truth. Claims that produce steadiness, complexity, and compassion are more likely to help you move forward constructively. This practice does not require perfection. It requires honesty about your own emotional state, because your emotional state is the doorway through which influence enters. For those of you focused on the secret space program element, disclosure has an added tension. Hidden programs are not hidden only because of technology; they are hidden because they are entangled with power. A program that would inspire humanity can also threaten the control structure, because inspired humans are harder to govern through fear. So disclosure of off-world activity, advanced craft, and non-human contact is often managed in ways that keep you either fascinated or frightened. Fascination keeps you passive. Fear keeps you obedient. Neither state produces sovereign action. This is why I, Ashtar, speak to you with a steady tone. Whether you accept my presence literally or symbolically, the intent is the same: to help you remain coherent so that contact, revelation, and transformation do not become new tools of control.
Contact thresholds are not only external events; they are internal conditions. When a population is violent, panicked, and easily manipulated, overt contact becomes unlikely, because it would be used as a weapon by the very structures that fear it. When a population is stable, curious, and capable of discernment, contact becomes more feasible, because it can serve awakening rather than domination. So when you ask, ‘when will the truth be revealed?’, also ask, ‘what state am I in, and what state are we in?’ The collective field matters. Your calm matters. Your integrity matters. This is not a burden; it is empowerment, because it means you are not waiting helplessly. You are participating. Spiritual discipline now matters immensely in this era as much as media hygiene. If you are flooded with fear, step away, breathe, and return to your body. If you are flooded with bitterness, offer forgiveness to yourself and to the parts of humanity that are still asleep, without excusing harm. Many of you know the Violet Flame as a transmutational practice. Use it not as a fantasy escape, but as a way to clear your own field so that you can act from coherence rather than reaction. When you clear your field, you become less vulnerable to psy-ops, because psy-ops rely on turbulence. A calm lake reflects the sky accurately; a stormy lake distorts everything. And yes, for those who long for contact, I will say this: contact unfolds in layers. There are inner contacts, intuitive contacts, dream contacts, and synchronicity contacts long before there are craft-in-the-sky contacts. Many of you already receive guidance and protection in subtle ways. We honor free will. We will not replace your agency with rescue. We will, however, amplify the pathways that support awakening, and we will continue to work with those who choose service, integrity, and compassion. This is why your daily choices matter. They are not small. They are the building blocks of the world you will meet. In the Venezuela narrative, you can see how psy-ops and disclosure intertwine. A dramatic event is used to send a message across networks, and at the same time it becomes a template that other powers cite for their own ambitions. The public is fed a moral story, while insiders read the logistics story. Alternative voices shout, mainstream voices scoff, and the population is pulled between extremes. If you can hold the middle, you become free. The middle is not apathy. The middle is clear sight without hysteria. It is the ability to say, ‘I will not be manipulated into hatred, and I will not be manipulated into blindness.’ This is the stance of an awakened citizen and an awakened lightworker. And so we invite you to treat every disclosure wave as a training. Can you remain kind when you are provoked? Can you remain thoughtful when you are rushed? Can you remain honest when your tribe wants a simpler story? These are not small questions. They are the gate to the next time-line. From here, the final step is practical: what does the ground crew do? How do starseeds and ordinary humans live in a way that supports liberation rather than feeding the machine? Let us close with that now.
And now, dear ground crew, we bring all of this into the practical. You did not come to Earth to be hypnotized by fear, and you did not come to Earth to become bitter at the darkness. You came to remember, to stabilize, and to help midwife a transition. Venezuela, in the framework you are exploring, is a vivid illustration of how power operates: through nodes, corridors, materials, and narratives. Yet the deeper lesson is not geopolitical. The deeper lesson is that consciousness changes the rulebook. When people stop consenting to manipulation, the manipulators must adapt, and adaptation is the beginning of their exposure. Hold, first, a human heart for the people on the ground. When headlines speak of regime changes and covert operations, remember that ordinary families still need food, medicine, safety, and dignity. It is easy to talk about a nation as a chessboard square. It is harder, and more sacred, to remember that every square contains children, elders, and courageous souls trying to live. If you want to serve, serve in a way that does not feed the machine: support humanitarian efforts you can verify, send prayers of stability, share truthful information without hatred, and refuse to dehumanize anyone. Dehumanization is the gateway drug of control systems. Second, build local resilience. The most peaceful revolution is the one that makes centralized control less necessary. Learn how to grow something. Learn how to repair something. Learn how to cooperate with neighbors. Build small networks of trust where resources and skills can be shared. When people are isolated, they are easy to steer. When people are connected, they become sovereign. This is not only spiritual; it is practical. Community is infrastructure, and it is the kind of infrastructure that no corporation can fully buy. Third, demand transparency in the systems that govern you, beginning with the systems that decide leadership. Ask for audits that ordinary citizens can understand. Ask for chain-of-custody that is visible. Ask for rules that make corruption expensive rather than profitable. Do this without violence. Violence is a shortcut that becomes a trap. It gives the control architecture justification for more control, and it burns the very people who are trying to be free. The way forward is courage plus patience, not rage plus destruction. If you need a mantra, let it be simple: clarity, accountability, and kindness. Fourth, practice information sovereignty. The machine age can make you feel as if you are drowning in content. You do not have to drink everything poured into you. Choose your inputs. Take breaks. Return to your senses. Put your feet on the earth. Talk to a real person. If you are on social platforms, be intentional. Share what builds coherence. Avoid what is designed to farm outrage. You are not required to be constantly informed. You are required to be inwardly stable. Stability is what allows you to act when the moment is real rather than reactive. Fifth, keep your spiritual tools practical. Prayer is practical when it steadies your nervous system and aligns your choices. Meditation is practical when it helps you hear your own intuition. The Violet Flame is practical when it helps you transmute your fear into clear action. If you speak with your star family inwardly, do so with humility and discernment. Seek guidance that increases your compassion and your responsibility, not guidance that flatters you into superiority. True contact, whether subtle or overt, always strengthens service and integrity.
You can also serve through your economic choices. Spend, when you can, in ways that strengthen local life rather than distant monopolies. Reduce unnecessary debt where possible, because debt is one of the quiet leashes of the old system. If you are drawn to the honest-money conversation, approach it with sobriety rather than frenzy. The point is not to gamble on collapse; the point is to stop being dependent on institutions that have not earned your trust. A calm relationship with resources is part of spiritual maturity. It frees your attention for what matters: relationships, service, and truth. And a final reminder: the existence of hidden programs does not mean you are powerless. It means you are living in a world where secrecy was used as a substitute for ethics. Your task is to help rebuild ethics, openly. If you focus only on the secret corridors, you can become drained. If you focus only on surface politics, you can become misled. The middle path is wise: know the patterns, but live as a human being who loves other human beings. This is how the new Earth is built: not by winning arguments, but by making life more truthful, more compassionate, and more free. Finally, remember the time-line truth: you are never stuck with one future. The future is a field of probabilities, and consciousness collapses probability into experience. When you choose truth over tribalism, you strengthen a time-line where disclosure becomes constructive rather than chaotic. When you choose community over isolation, you strengthen a time-line where people can weather transitions without panic. When you choose compassion over hatred, you strengthen a time-line where the fall of corrupt structures does not require the collapse of human dignity. This is what it means to be a lightworker in a political world: you do not escape the world, and you do not become the world. You stand within it as a steady signal of sanity. I am Ashtar and I offer this not as dogma but as an encouragement to remember your power. The story of Venezuela, in your framework, is a story of corridors and resources, yes, but it is also a story about the moment when humanity begins to see the machinery and chooses to step out of it. Walk gently. Walk bravely. Walk with discernment. And as you move forward, know that you are not alone. I leave you now in peace, in love, and in oneness.
